Peer Reviews

Peer Review Statement for Article Acceptance 

As organizers and editors of the academic conference on The Thirteenth International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management Untar 2024, we adhere to rigorous standards of scholarly excellence and integrity. The peer review process plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality and credibility of the research presented at our conference. Each submitted article undergoes thorough evaluation by independent experts in the field, who assess its originality, significance, methodology, and contribution to knowledge.

Our peer review process follows the principles of transparency, fairness, and confidentiality. All reviewers are selected based on their expertise and scholarly reputation, and they are required to declare any potential conflicts of interest before undertaking the review process. Reviewers, double-blindedly, are instructed to provide constructive feedback and objective evaluations, focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of the submitted manuscript.

Criteria for Evaluation:

  • Originality: The extent to which the research contributes new insights, theories, or methodologies to the field.
  • Significance: The relevance and importance of the research topic in advancing knowledge and addressing significant challenges or gaps in the literature.
  • Methodology: The appropriateness, rigor, and clarity of the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques employed.
  • Clarity and Coherence: The clarity, organization, and coherence of the manuscript, including the logical flow of arguments, clarity of language, and adherence to scholarly conventions.
  • Contribution to Knowledge: The extent to which the research advances understanding, stimulates further inquiry, or has practical implications for academia, industry, or society.
  • Reviewers are asked to provide a detailed evaluation of each manuscript, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses, offering suggestions for improvement, and making a recommendation regarding its acceptance, revision, or rejection. The review process is conducted anonymously to ensure impartiality and to protect the confidentiality of both authors and reviewers.

Authors are notified of the outcome of the peer review process in a timely manner and are provided with feedback from the reviewers to assist them in revising and improving their manuscripts, if necessary. Accepted articles are selected based on their scholarly merit, relevance to the conference theme, and overall contribution to the field of study.

We are committed to upholding the highest standards of academic excellence and integrity in the peer review process, and we extend our sincere appreciation to all reviewers for their invaluable contributions to maintaining the quality and credibility of our conference proceedings.